Search for: "STATEN v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2016, 4:46 am
In the case at hand, The State of New Hampshire v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:45 am
Staten, 2016 U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
Stated otherwise, the duty imposed upon a municipality when it undertakes to act in loco parentis is nondelegable (see Bartels v County of Westchester, 76 AD2d 517, 523). [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
It noted, quoting the United States Supreme Court in Bell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
NYPD retiree “shared his happiness at scoring the disability pension, as well as his achievements running marathons” [New York Daily News] Scott Greenfield on public sector unionism and Friedrichs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
The CCDI has identified state-owned enterprises as its focus this year. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 5:24 am
The underlying case, Husain v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Generally speaking, estoppel cannot be used against a state or municipal government (see e.g., New York State Medical Transporters Association v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court held in Mistretta v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court held in Mistretta v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court held in Mistretta v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:44 pm
Mental Hygiene Law §81.07(g)(1)(v). [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:45 am
Ctr. of Staten Island v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:54 pm
The court is mindful of the decision of Zeek v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 pm
See Baskin v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 6:42 pm
See Baskin v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:00 pm
Upon being informed that none did, he stated that the hearing was closed. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am
” See also, as to figure skating, Staten v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:48 pm
That was once not uncommon in certain circles, to the point that some state legislatures did feel the need to take action. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:52 pm
A Staten Island Probate Lawyer said the first exception, as stated in the affirmative, is that the sister-state judgment, decree or order must be 'entitled to full faith and credit in this state within the meaning of Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution which mandates that Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the judicial proceedings of every other State. [read post]
