Search for: "STOCKER v. STOCKER"
Results 1 - 20
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
ASAE was part of a team that carried out several checks on retailers, stockers, and packers in the olive oil sector in several regions. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:26 am
Giving Tuesday Giving Tuesday: Please Support Just Security with a Tax-Deductible Donation by Tess Bridgeman (@bridgewriter) and Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) Symposium: Atrocity Prevention Invest in Early Prevention and Continuous Learning to Help Curb Atrocities in a Challenging Era by Lawrence Woocher COP28 To Avert Climate Crisis, Democracies Need to Protect Civil Space by Kirk Herbertson (@KirkHerbertson) Tracking COP28: Notable Moments and Key Themes by Katherine Fang (@fang_kath) and Clara Apt… [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
But inexplicably the company failed to accommodate those requests, causing the impacted individuals to resign.Believing that such conduct violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:37 am
Slagel v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm
A welcome move away from the reasoning in Stocker v Stocker, in which the High Court and Court of Appeal held (before being overturned by the Supreme Court) that a woman had defamed her ex-husband in saying he tried to strangle her when it “was beyond dispute” that he had grasped her by the throat so tightly as to leave red marks on her neck visible to police officers two hours later. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
A good example of this is Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17; [2018] EWCA Civ 170; [2016] EWHC 474 (QB) in which the meaning of five words “he tried to strangle me” went all the way on appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am
And finally…II In Dutton v Bazzi [2021] FCA 1474, Rares and Rangiah JJ of the Federal Court of Australia cited Lord Kerr in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 at [43] who said: …it is wrong to engage in elaborate analysis of a tweet“. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 11:53 am
” Stocker Hinge Mfg. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Rose v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm
In the well known case of Stocker v Stocker, although the case failed on meaning it was accepted that publication had been proved on the basis that the message was visible to the 110 Facebook friends of the person to whom it was addressed. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm
This means it is not primarily equipped to deal with collective aspects of identity, such as race.[3] Perhaps this is because the “ordinary, reasonable reader” has neither race nor gender: a construct recognised as potential problematic “in key contexts that involve ‘culturally polarized understandings of fact’”.[4] In seeking to universalise the human experience, the hypothetical referee at the centre of defamation law overlooks and erases differences.[5] The… [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm
The same court confirmed the importance of context in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17, where the fact that publication was in a Facebook post was critical, as Facebook is ‘a casual medium; it is in the nature of conversation rather than carefully chosen expression; and that it is pre-eminently one in which the reader reads and passes on’ (Lord Kerr, para. 43). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 6:58 am
Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 A determination of meaning following a Facebook post from a divorcee regarding her ex-husband allegedly trying to strangle her. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law, Strasbourg: ML and WW v Germany, Article 8 right to be forgotten and the media – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills Case Law: Venables v News Group Papers, Application to Vary Confidentiality Injunction Dismissed, PJS extended – Samuel Rowe Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court abolished common law presumption of damage in libel cases – Mathilde Groppo Supreme Court considers social media defamation: context… [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 933 Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors([2019] EWCA Civ 852) The defendant was successful in the first three cases and the claimant in third The Supreme Court heard two libel cases: Lachaux v Independent Print [2019] UKSC 27 and Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The court reiterated the principles as set out in Jeynes v News Magazine Ltd [2008] EWCA, Civ. 130, as affirmed in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 12:47 pm
The case is Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
