Search for: "STORE v. LUCAS"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2023, 2:16 pm
I hear you asking: "How does municipal zoning, environmental review and cannabis stores legally interact? [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Monclova Christian Academy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:05 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, 134 S. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:45 pm
Yet, the CFAA was a hotly contested issue in Nelson Levine De Luca & Hamilton, LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
As such, many gamers bought Plants v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm
Nevertheless, the Lucas court showed that it -- unlike, say, the Fourth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
The decision in Lucas v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:48 pm
Yet, the CFAA was a hotly contested issue in Nelson Levine De Luca & Hamilton, LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:45 pm
Yet, the CFAA was a hotly contested issue in Nelson Levine De Luca & Hamilton, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 11:12 am
Lucas (Tenn. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:58 am
Vicente-Lucas, 2011 U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 5:38 am
The Supreme Court ruled in Lucas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
Concurrent wives and concurrent use of trade marks in Lucas' first guest-post -- who could ask for more? [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The decision is about likelihood of confusion, reputed trade marks' extended protection, and passing off.* The Naked Truth: use of BARELY THERE wasn't even barely thereAnother Irish Patents Office’s decision that Jeremy reports is HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
See Kurtz v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:13 am
For instance, although an arrest took place in Lucas v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 10:04 pm
N.Y. 1979) (DAILY PLANET for store); DC Comics Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
Lucas, 640 F.3d 168, 178 (6th Cir. 2011); see also United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
The Solicitor General had urged the Court to deny review in Lucas v. [read post]
