Search for: "STRICKLAND v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED" Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm by Viking
  and (2) whether, under Strickland v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
For the full list of petitions on our watch list, continue reading after the jump. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
[No petition for review filed].Sonya Strickland, a Junction City public defender, won in State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
DiazDocket: 10-1264Issue(s): (1) Whether it is necessarily unreasonable under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 16-9282, concerns how a prisoner can establish that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel under the familiar standard of Strickland v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
‘Tis the season for making lists, dear readers! [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am by Gideon
We have further recognized that the purpose of providing assistance of counsel “is simply to ensure that criminal defendants receive a fair trial,” Strickland v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
ADA pleading – more than boilerplate is required Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am by Maureen Johnston
McNeal 13-963Issue: Whether, contrary to Strickland v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Avery Issue: Whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which affirmed the grant of a habeas petition, abrogated the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 pm by Mary Dwyer
Foster12-420Issue: Whether a federal habeas court must grant Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) deference to both components of a state court’s merits adjudication of a defendant’s Strickland v. [read post]