Search for: "STUART v. EDWARDS" Results 41 - 60 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
Edward White's Tort Law in America (Oxford University Press, 1980, 2003). [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Mesa The Rise of Blockchains and Regulatory Scrutiny Posted by Stuart Levi, Gregory Fernicola and Eytan Fisch, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Friday, March 9, 2018 Tags: Bitcoin, Blockchain, Contracts, Cryptocurrency, Derivatives, Financial regulation, ICOs, Money laundering, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation Are Financial Constraints Priced? [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 1:25 pm by David Kopel
The Stuarts Rebellion: The History of England from James I to the Glorious Revolution. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
Commissioner John Edwards said he did not issue a warranted £10 million fine “as any money paid in fines is returned to government, and so the impact would have been minimal. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
” • • • Redefining Free Culture was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesSee, for example, The Ethics of Consent, pp. 45-51 (Oxford University Press 2010), citing Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.See, for example, Lynch v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:02 am
If you've seen this movie, you probably ARE one in a million It's not often that the IPKat ventures into the remote and exotic surroundings of the Queens Bench Technology and Construction Court, but he has found this delightful little gem from a judge he never knew existed, Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:48 pm by Randy Barnett
 Judge Edwards clearly telegraphed his view that little needed to be said to find that the ACA is constitutional (as he said very little art argument or in his concurrence). [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Bruce, Cornell Law School; Edward W. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Lemley, Stanford Law School; Carl Malamud, Public.Resource.Org; John Mayer, Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction; Tim O’Reilly, O’Reilly Media; Stuart Sierra, Columbia Law School; Erika V. [read post]