Search for: "SULLIVAN v. SHIELDS CORPORATION"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am
Sullivan for deciding when the First Amendment shields whoever disseminates material damaging to the reputation of a public official or public figure from liability. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Recent Threats to Sullivan and Its Progeny Coral Ridge, which arose from the Southern Poverty Law Center’s characterization of a Christian ministry and media corporation as a hate group, was not a particularly good vehicle for overturning Sullivan. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:05 am
Beyond issues of bad publicity, attacked candidates are often reluctant to sue because of the New York Times v Sullivan standards that make it hard to prove defamation of a public figure. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
On 2 March 2022, Nicklin J gave an ex tempore judgment dismissing the libel claim in Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation v Burgis. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
"Any expectation that a PRC law will successfully shield discovery in a U.S. litigation needs a tempering of realism. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
Robins and the Dalkon shield cases, or the Manville Corporation asbestos cases). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
It also does not offer U.S. litigants reciprocal solicitude in its own courts, which shield the very actors who sometimes get unduly credulous treatment from the American judiciary. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
Sullivan,” which “generally shields reporters and news platforms from libel or defamation lawsuits provided they were acting in good faith”; Thomas argued that “the high court was wrong to usurp the role of states in regulating libel. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
Sullivan, Kavanaugh concluded that the prisoner, who had been convicted of murdering two U.S. marshals, was a “limited purpose public figure. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am
At the Human Rights at Home blog, Margaret Drew suggests that after Jesner, “[k]eeping an eye on upcoming cases on the rights of individuals versus business entities will clarify how much corporate shielding the court is willing to do while eliminating some remedies for individual human rights violations. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Supreme Court held that “government officials performing discretionary functions are generally shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:00 pm
Claiborne Hardware and New York Times v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:00 pm
Claiborne Hardware and New York Times v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
A parallel case (Du Daobin v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 12:13 pm
Sullivan, Jr. and Jay B. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:30 am
Sullivan , 332 U. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:46 am
For example, in Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
How can the 1A shield the reporters’ minds and notes but not new tech that records and preserves in a more reliable way? [read post]
