Search for: "Sachs v. Sachs" Results 61 - 80 of 1,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2017, 3:46 am by Lorene Park
In so holding, the court revisited and departed from another judge’s interpretation of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 7:34 am by Joy Waltemath
The former employee claims that her supervisors pressured her to retract findings that Goldman Sachs did not have an adequate enterprise-wide policy to manage conflicts of interest and terminated her employment when she refused to agree (Segarra v Federal Reserve Bank of New York) According to the former examiner’s complaint, she was hired as a senior examiner in October 2011 and immediately put to work examining Goldman Sachs’ conflicts of interest program. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:57 am by jbyrne
 Among the most contentious of these battles has been Overstock.com v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 6:20 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also overruled various objections to the magistrate’s memorandum and order as to expert testimony on class certification (Chen-Oster v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm by Andrew Hamm
Sachs is here; the transcript in Hawkins v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:56 am by David Hart QC
Sachs J (Albie Sachs) gave the judgment of the Constitutional Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 4:09 pm by Andrew Delaney
Mixing a lot of areas of practice hereSachs v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:23 am
Interesting story in today's Washington Post on the Tax Court's decision last week in Stamoulis v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:00 am
On Friday, we blogged the Tax Court's decision in Stamoulis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:15 pm by Sandy
Goldman, Sachs & Co., NCUA brought a lawsuit against Goldman, Sachs on behalf of a credit unit that it was liquidating. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:52 am by Joy Waltemath
Three female employees seeking class certification of pattern-or-practice gender bias claims on behalf of female professionals in Goldman Sachs’ four revenue-generating divisions were entitled to unredacted copies of all internal complaints made by female employees within the four divisions that were “conceivably related” to gender discrimination, even if the complainant was not a member of the putative class, a federal magistrate judge in New York ruled, granting the… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:59 am
Oral Argument in case# 09-4010; Premium Plus Partner v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 11:07 pm by Will Baude
(Will Baude) On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Atlantic Marine v. [read post]