Search for: "Sackler v. Sackler"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2024, 8:42 am
From Sackler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm
” And on this evening’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered,” Nina Totenberg had an audio segment titled “It’s money v. principle in Supreme Court opioid case. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:51 am
Those of you who have been following the opioid lawsuits know that on Monday, December 4, 2023, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments over whether to allow the billionaire Sackler family behind Purdue Pharma to glom on to Purdue's... [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
I'm the primary presenter on three topics: the overruling of Chevron deference in the Loper Bright case (plus a comment on the Corner Post case); the Second Amendment ruling in Rahimi and the statutory ruling on bump stocks in Garland v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm
I won't pretend to understand the intricate bankruptcy issues at play in Harrington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 10:11 am
In Commonwealth v., Purdue Pharma L.P, the suit alleges that the Sackler family benefited financially by allegedly pushing painkillers onto doctors and patients while reaping billions over the course of a decade, all while contributing to the deadly opioid epidemic and impacting thousands nationwide. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
There is an ongoing debate over whether the MQD is a substantive canon that serves separation of powers or simply a tool of ordinary statutory interpretation, as Justice Barrett argued in her concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday in one of the highest-profile bankruptcies in recent memory: Harrington v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 7:04 am
Listen to the episode here: Pharma Fallout: How Harrington v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:44 am
Against this background comes Harrington v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
The first is Ohio v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
Purdue Pharma LP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 10:26 am
In Commonwealth v., Purdue Pharma L.P, the suit alleges that the Sackler family benefited financially by allegedly pushing painkillers onto doctors and patients while reaping billions over the course of a decade, all while contributing to the deadly opioid epidemic and impacting thousands nationwide. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:16 am
The justices will then hear oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
Yet pressure exerted by mass torts, including the needs of victims, has led lawyers on both sides of the “v” to innovate in the name of resolution. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:45 pm
Tax Appeals Tribunal (Indian Taxation)Ronald H. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:14 pm
They argued that the issue in their case is the same one that the justices are currently considering in Harrington v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:07 pm
Likewise, the dissent hemmed and hawed about Purdue’s indemnification of the Sacklers, but that indemnification is contingent until the Sacklers are actually found liable for something, and that means that the indemnification claim would be disallowed under section 502(e). [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm
Despite Purdue’s criminal conduct occurring while members of the well-known Sackler family were at the company’s helm, none of the Sacklers have faced criminal charges, or admitted liability. [read post]
