Search for: "Sacks v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Sacks, No. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
The case is Staley v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:49 am
The case is Thomas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
Reading all the opinions here, it looks like the state of the law in the Second Circuit on Title IX discrimination is in flux. [read post]
Hunter’s Heroic Epic: Biden Files Motion Comparing Himself to Dead Romanovs and Ancient Greek Heroes
1 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
Hunter v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:34 am
The Court of Appeals (Sack, Lohier, Kahn) says:While the 2014 Notice draws attention to the arbitration provision, it misleadingly states that there “continues to be a Mandatory Arbitration Provision. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am
Then to make the week complete, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:21 pm
The case is Parks v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
These are the ones that are supposed to come wrapped in IRS Form 709; the United States Gift Tax Return. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 12:49 pm
United States – Navigating Between ‘Politics As Usual’ and Sacks of Cash,” on SSRN and forthcoming in Yale L.J. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:32 pm
United States – Navigating Between ‘Politics As Usual’ and Sacks of Cash (Forthcoming, Yale Law Journal Forum) on SSRN. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 7:54 am
In Clemente v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:09 am
” ECF No. 83-1 at 4.Davi v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 152 (KB) We’ve seen previous instalments in this matter here and here. [read post]
