Search for: "Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. US Light & Heating Co." Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Next came the “tailpipe rule,” setting specific standards for emissions of greenhouse gases from light cars and trucks, including fuel efficiency standards for those vehicles. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Theoretically, the two-week conference will focus on measures to limit emissions of the heat-trapping gases blamed for global warming. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
Other sources claim tiles or pottery-shards were used.) [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
– Occupational Health & Safety, February 14, 2010 The Environmental Protection Agency has settled with seven firms and individuals ac [read post]