Search for: "Sage Realty v. PROSKAUER ROSE"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 5:29 am
In New York, the case of Sage Realty Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:29 am
"The petitioners in Sage Realty retained Proskauer to represent them in a multi-million dollar mortgage financing and a restructuring of ownership interests, all involving New York City properties. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:19 am
Proskauer Rose, which held that clients are entitled to all of their attorney's work product, did not apply to absent class members. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:11 am
The trial court agreed, relying on Matter of Sage Realty Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Slip op. at *5-*6 (hyperlink added) (citing Sage Realty Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
The latter rule of law treats material prepared for a client, such as an entity’s owner, as a “property right,” and a law firm has a “general duty to provide that material . . . upon . . . request absent a substantial showing of good cause to refuse client access” (Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn LLP, 294 AD2d 190 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
In Matter of Sage Realty Corp. v. [read post]
