Search for: "Sahin v. State"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Schramm & Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko, Germany v Italy Marta Carneiro, Kirsten Ketscher & Freya Semanda, Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others Sara Bengtson, Damian Gonzalez-Salzberg, Loveday Hodson & Paul Johnson, Christine Goodwin v the United Kingdom Amel Alghrani, Amal Ali & Jill Marshall, Leyla Sahin v Turkey Nicola Barker, Burden v the United… [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:53 am
”[9] The Turkish Headscarf Ban Case (2004) In Sahin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552, and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
The Turkish headscarf ban has been the subject of an investigation by the European Court of Human Rights in Leyla Sahin v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:28 pm
” Judge Tulkens of the European Court of Human Rights (Sahin v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 5:43 am
Some Reflections on the Pros and Cons of a Wide Margin of Appreciation in the Case of Sahin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:23 am
In Sahin v Turkey (2007) 44 EHRR 5 the Court assumed that the applicant? [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 6:17 pm
The Court stated in Chaoulli v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
As for Article 9, the authorities indicate that this provision only provides a qualified right to manifest religious belief and that interferences in the sphere of employment and analogous spheres are readily found to be justified (Sahin v Turkey (2005) 44EHRR 99 ). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:05 am
Art. 2, Prot. 1 would appear to apply to all levels of education, including higher education (see, e.g., Sahin v Turkey). [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
However, even not going as far as arguing that ‘the amendments will abolish the Sieckmann judgement’ (Sahin 2016, 513), it is not excluded that the seven criteria may be interpreted differently in the future, for example as meaning that a combination of description, chemical formula and sample may meet the new requirements for registration. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm
A similar approach (with different outcome) has been taken in Ribeiro v Wright, 2020 ONSC 1829, Court of Ontario, Canada. [read post]
