Search for: "Saker v. Saker "
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2014, 10:13 pm
Master Gordon-Saker’s earlier sensible decision was reinstated. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:15 am
The Oregon Supreme Court decided on Friday, 6/1/07, in State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 11:06 pm
The Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker has given definitive guidance as to how bills should be divided in the case of BP v Cardiff & Vale University Local Health Board [2015] EWHC B13: Divided between periods where different proportionality test … Continue reading → [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 10:54 pm
An interesting aside from Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker in BP v Cardiff & Vale University Local Health Board [2015] EWHC B13 when considering a case with a pre-1st April 2013 CFA where the new proportionality test applied to work … Continue reading → [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 7:39 am
However, in Shipe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:32 pm
Hot on the heels of Master Gordon-Saker’s proportionality decision in BNM v MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B13 (Costs) is another decision from the Senior Courts Costs Office, this time from Master Rowley in Dr Brian May v Wavell Group Plc. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 10:24 pm
In King v Basildon & Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust he expressly disagreed with the decision of Master Gordon-Saker in BNM v […] [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:00 pm
On Thursday, September 13,Victoria Saker Woeste, American Bar Foundation, will be deliver the Constitution Day lecture at Syracuse University Law School. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 10:14 pm
Last week in Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) (10 July 2020) the Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker handed down a reserved judgment in relation to three discreet issues where I acted for the Defendant paying party. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:20 pm
The decision of Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker in Kenton v Slee Blackwell PLC [2023] EWHC 2613 (SCCO) is another warning as to the dangers of failing to give proper costs estimates. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:43 pm
The Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker prefaced his recent decision on proportionality, in Various Claimants (In Wave 1 of the Mirror Newspapers Hacking Litigation) v MGN Ltd [2018] EWHC B13 (Costs), with the warning: “this judgment should not be taken as any attempt at providing guidance. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:48 pm
Much of the commentary on Master Gordon-Saker’s recent proportionality decision in BNM v MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B13 (Costs) has understandably focused on the reductions made to the “reasonable” costs (approximately a 50% reduction). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:06 pm
I have already written about the case of Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) (10 July 2020) where the Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker declined the Claimant’s invitation to award pre-judgment interest on costs. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:37 am
Last week, I discussed Shipe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:59 am
Per the holding in Vance v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Per the holding in Vance v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Per the holding in Vance v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:57 am
Per the holding in Vance v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:08 am
The Friday, 3/28/08, Oregonian story by Anne Saker, "Oregon patient sues over sexual abuse. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
Kermit V. [read post]
