Search for: "Saks v Saks"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
" Underscoring the Supreme Court's decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Bandukda Last week, in Till v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:34 am
When Saks filed amended returns, the taxing authorities ("the County") agreed to and did pay the requested refund amounts, but Saks' claim for interest.Saks filed suit, and the trial court dismissed for failure to state a claim. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:04 am
Hells Angels Motorcycle Club, owner of various federal registrations for HELLS ANGELS and design mark depicting a skull with wings, sues the Alexander McQueen fashion house, Saks and Zappos for selling jewelry, apparel and accessories that infringe and dilute the Hells Angels' marks. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
" Also, under the Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:16 am
That's the strategy that the plaintiff pursued in this case, but the Court of Appeals disagrees, and the case is over.The case is Bright-Asante v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:06 am
Denham v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 10:05 am
Court of Appeals devoted an entire opinion to it in Holmes v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:13 pm
In Saks Management and Associates, LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:13 pm
In Saks Management and Associates, LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:13 pm
In Saks Management and Associates, LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:14 am
In Saks Management and Associates, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 5:54 pm
Plaintiff is an apparel company named Derek Andrew, Inc. that sells a high-end (read: expensive) clothing line called "Twisted Heart" at Nordstrom, Saks Fifth Avenue, and Neiman Marcus. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:48 am
Jamal v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Gaines v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 11:22 am
Mikel, et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 7:15 am
Fast 101 v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 9:52 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Rainford, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 2474 (Admin) (17 October 2008) Times Newspapers Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2008] EWHC 2455 (Admin) (17 October 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Jones & Ors v Firkin-Flood [2008] EWHC 2417 (Ch) (17 October 2008) DCC Holdings (UK) Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2008] EWHC… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:53 am
The Saks & Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:07 pm
He noted that the proper method for balancing competing rights and interests is the balancing test set out in Re S [2004] UKHL 47, and he suggested that the following Convention rights were relevant in the circumstances: the defendants Article 10 ECHR right; the rights of SAK’s children and SAK’s wife to receive information under Article 10 ECHR; and the Article 8 ECHR right to respect for private and family life of the claimants, SAK’s grown up children,… [read post]
