Search for: "Salinas v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
But the appeals court rebuffed this homespun test and, applying its new approach to the facts at hand, held the defendants were jointly and severally liable for overtime violations and that the plaintiffs’ weekly work hours should be aggregated for purposes of calculating overtime hours worked (Salinas v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Gonzalez-Perez, V. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
See Salinas v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
See Salinas v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 10:00 am
Last January in Hurst v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
In the Ninth Circuit, where this warrant was obtained, I can understand why the officers sought out explicit permission: In United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court precedent set in Lockhard v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 10:24 am
Case in point: United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:58 am
(Colon v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:48 am
" In 2011, the Supreme Court reversed one such evasion in Walker v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 1:38 pm
” [7] United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:33 pm
For example, just over a hundred years ago, the Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:11 am
Last year’s decision in ITN Flix, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
V. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
Salinas, 119 Wash.2d 192, 829 P.2d 1068 (Washington Supreme Court 1992). [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
To learn more, please see our 50 State Non-Compete and Trade Secrets Desktop Reference. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Salinas v. [read post]