Search for: "Sample v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 4,549
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm by Bill Marler
  In Pinner [21] microbiologic survey of refrigerated foods specimens obtained from households with listeriosis patients, 36 percent of the beef samples and 31 percent of the poultry samples were contaminated with Listeria. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Zendejas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:25 am by Michael Oykhman
In R v Stone, 1999 CanLII 688 (SCC), [1999] 2 SCR 290, the Supreme Court of Canada defined automatism as “a state of impaired consciousness. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:04 am by Michael Oykhman
In R v Stone, 1999 CanLII 688 (SCC), [1999] 2 SCR 290, the Supreme Court of Canada defined automatism as “a state of impaired consciousness. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:36 am by Dan Filler
To request this document in an alternate format or to request a reasonable accommodation, please contact the Department of Accessibility Services at 404-727-9877 (V) | 404-712-2049 (TDD). [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:53 am by Eric Goldman
A sampling: Defendant could make changes that would minimize predators’ access to children. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
Supreme Court later cribbed from him in its famous unenumerated rights case of Meyer v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:09 am by Robin Frazer Clark
I don’t often write about appellate opinions from appellate courts of states other than Georgia, but as I was reading some recent appellate opinions, the Virginia case of Morris v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm
In this Commentary, I show how the tradition-entrenching methods the Court employed to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]