Search for: "Samples v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 12:28 pm
We’ve been pretty successful dealing with DNA issues, we practice in a state that does not automatically take DNA samples, and we’ve fought hard to prevent the taking of any such samples from our clients. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:24 am
In 1991, in the case of Chaves County Home Health Service Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:30 pm
The Court rejected Sprint’s reliance on Preston v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:52 am
On cross examination, the defense confronted her with an e-mail she had written five days later where she stated that she dipped her finger in the sample to gauge the temperature. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:34 am
Supreme Court released a 5-4 decision in the Maryland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
The Facts of State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:48 pm
Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Nat Weiner – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:48 pm
Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Nat Weiner – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:48 pm
Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Nat Weiner – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:48 pm
Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Nat Weiner – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
22 Jul 2005, 1:52 pm
The post State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
” So, the legal effect of Bridgeport on digital sampling has been vastly overstated. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:44 am
The litigation, captioned Bearder et al v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:09 am
Feb. 18, 2009)], a point which even plaintiffs agreed was an issue here, the Court concluded that individual inquiry could be overcome by the use of statistical sampling similar to that approved by the Ninth Circuit in Hilao v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
In my preview of Tuesday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:00 pm
In United States ex rel Guardiola v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
Will and to State v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:02 am
It should not destroy any blood or urine test samples unless and until the driver has actual knowledge the state intends to destroy the sample and waives the right to examination. [read post]
