Search for: "Samsung Electronics USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
Highlights this week included: Samsung loses Dutch case against Apple over 3G patents as court gives meaning to FRAND (FOSS Patents) (EPLAW) Australia: Samsung appeals, retaliates, in patent war with Apple (Patentology) (ipwars.com) Supreme Court of Canada: Hyperlinking is not publication: Crookes v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:32 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. of… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:23 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:45 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey AT&T, Inc. of Dallas, Texas Best Buy Co., Inc. of Richfield, Minnesota BrandsMart USA, Inc. of Hollywood, Florida In addition, Chief ALJ Paul J. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”), Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, No. 15-927 (laches in patent cases) Briefing: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; LG Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Toshiba… [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:26 am
Discussions will be delivered by leading experts from India, Europe and the USA. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
The Kat is question is Darren Smyth (EIP), who only a few days ago rested his posting paws after a tiring six-month stint as one of three guest Kats for the first half of the year and who now, to the great pleasure of us all, has just presented the blog with a hot-off-the-press analysis of this morning's ruling of Judge Birss QC, sitting as a Patents Court judge, in Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which is fully illustrated and fun to read… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
The Kat is question is Darren Smyth (EIP), who only a few days ago rested his posting paws after a tiring six-month stint as one of three guest Kats for the first half of the year and who now, to the great pleasure of us all, has just presented the blog with a hot-off-the-press analysis of this morning's ruling of Judge Birss QC, sitting as a Patents Court judge, in Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which is fully illustrated and fun to read… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
The Kat is question is Darren Smyth (EIP), who only a few days ago rested his posting paws after a tiring six-month stint as one of three guest Kats for the first half of the year and who now, to the great pleasure of us all, has just presented the blog with a hot-off-the-press analysis of this morning's ruling of Judge Birss QC, sitting as a Patents Court judge, in Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which is fully illustrated and fun to read… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:34 pm
Patent No. 6,263,505 (the ‘505 patent): D&M Holdings, Inc. of Japan D&M Holdings US, Inc. of Mahwah, New Jersey Denon Electronics (USA) LLC of Mahwah, New Jersey Funai Electric Co., Ltd. of Japan Funai Corp., Inc. of Rutherford, New Jersey Haier Group Corp. of China Haier America Trading, LLC of New York, New York Harman International Industries, Inc. of Stamford, Connecticut Inkel Corp. of South Korea LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG… [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
First on the schedule is Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 10:02 am
In the authors’ view, Judge Newman’s analysis on the issue of copying and related commercial success might be relevant in view of the current litigation between Apple, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:15 am
Take a look at all the Apple claims in the Samsung trial via The Verge. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 pm
Patent Nos. 5,926,636 (the ‘636 patent), 5,929,655 (the ‘655 patent), 6,208,879 (the ‘879 patent), and 6,456,841 (the ‘841 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:51 pm
According to the Order, on April 2, 2010, Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co., Ltd., Apple Inc., AsusTek Computer, Inc., Asus Computer International, Inc., Transcend Information, Inc., Transcend Information, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
The original Respondents were Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”), LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:43 am
Zimmer, Inc., et al., No. 14-1520 (enhanced damages) (linked to Halo) Petition for Writ of Certiorari Pending: Design Patents: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
