Search for: "Samsung Electronics USA Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
Apple Inc. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm
By way of background, and according to the notice, the Complainant in this investigation is Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. and the Respondents are Spansion, Inc., Spansion LLC, D-Link Corp., D-Link Systems, Inc., Alpine Electronics, Inc., Alpine Electronics of America, Inc., and Egreat USA. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:40 am
Samsung, (Case No. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:40 am
Samsung, (Case No. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
Coach USA, Inc., et al. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
Coach USA, Inc., et al. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”), Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:56 pm
Does 1 (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions Google gets good results in three adwords trademark cases: Jurin, Flowbee, Dazzlesmile (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court dismisses Tiffany’s final claim against eBay: Tiffany (NJ) Inc. and Tiffany and Company v. eBay, Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
Distributors of Electronics Assoc.; Nemours Foundation; Premier, Inc.; Premier Farnell; Resource Media; Samsung; Sprout Creation; Stokes Lawrence; and Wells Fargo. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
The defendants named in the action are: AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; LG Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:51 pm
According to the Order, on April 2, 2010, Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co., Ltd., Apple Inc., AsusTek Computer, Inc., Asus Computer International, Inc., Transcend Information, Inc., Transcend… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 1:27 pm
Distributors of Electronics Assoc.; Nemours Foundation; Premier, Inc.; Premier Farnell; Resource Media; Samsung; Sprout Creation; Stokes Lawrence; and Wells Fargo. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 971 F.2d 1395, 1397-99 (9th Cir .1992) (same); Newcombe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again: Two… [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
The original Respondents were Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”), LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm
The Respondents in this investigation are: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung International, Inc.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; Apple Inc.; AsusTek Computer, Inc.; Asus Computer International, Inc.; Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.; Kingston Technology Co., Inc.; Kingston… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm
In the Order, ALJ Charneski granted a December 16, 2009 joint motion filed by Complainant Eastman Kodak Company and Respondents LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog) Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics) Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars) Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos Services… [read post]
