Search for: "Samuel Bray"
Results 181 - 200
of 311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
[Does the statute mean that trains have to stop for squirrels?] [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
The Supreme Court has had a number of major statutory interpretation cases in recent years. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:30 pm
[Are the days of the national injunction numbered?] [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:58 pm
And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Samuel Bray has a post titled “A major decision on the FTC and equitable restitution; The Seventh Circuit reverses course. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:43 am
[The Seventh Circuit reverses course] There was a very significant decision yesterday from the Seventh Circuit on whether the Federal Trade Commission can seek restitution under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 9:13 am
[The Parable of the Forms] If you are starting law school this fall, one of your classes might be civil procedure. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:09 pm
Preserving the chance for different courts to weigh in can yield fresh insights and enhance appellate decisionmaking, as Samuel Bray has observed. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:47 pm
” Samuel Bray has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:00 pm
[A new phase for the national injunction?] [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:26 am
” And in response at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Samuel Bray has a post titled “National injunctions and equitable mootness; The Ninth Circuit orders briefing on whether one national injunction moots another. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
See Samuel L. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 8:35 pm
The latest national injunction has landed. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Briefly: At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Samuel Bray looks at Putnam Investments, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:29 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court called for the views of the Solicitor General on Putnam Investments, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:54 pm
Fiduciary Remedies, Samuel L. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
Compare and contrast this passage from the district court decision holding unconstitutional, under the Second Amendment, the California statute prohibiting magazines with more than ten rounds: Defendant Attorney General Xavier Becerra, and his officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with him, and those duly sworn state peace officers and federal law enforcement officers who gain knowledge of this injunction order, or know of the… [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
Compare and contrast this passage from the district court decision holding unconstitutional, under the Second Amendment, the California statute prohibiting magazines with more than ten rounds: Defendant Attorney General Xavier Becerra, and his officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with him, and those duly sworn state peace officers and federal law enforcement officers who gain knowledge of this injunction order, or know of the… [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:18 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court decided Bucklew v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:18 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court decided Bucklew v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 8:10 pm
” Samuel Bray has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy” about an amicus brief filed today in which he joined. [read post]
