Search for: "Sanchez v. State Bar" Results 141 - 160 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2010, 11:11 am
Wolens that this preemption clause barred a state law claim under a state consumer fraud statute challenging retroactive changes in a frequent flyer program, but that a state law claim for breach of contract would not be preempted. . . . [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Wilner served as counsel of record to Guantanamo detainees in Rasul v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:18 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Denicola v Costello, 44 AD3d 990; Tejada v Jonas, 17 AD3d 448; Sanchez v City of New York, 305 AD2d 487). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:30 pm
Medtronic, in which the Court ruled that federal law barred state-level claims for defective devices. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 am
Medtronic, in which the Court ruled that federal law barred state-level claims for defective devices. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 06, 2008 Santos-Sanchez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Pratt, No. 06-2287 An appeal from a conviction and sentence pursuant to a guilty plea to three counts of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to import marijuana, and to commit money laundering is dismissed as barred by the waiver of appeal to which he consented in his plea agreement. . [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
  In one case widely seen as destined for the Supreme Court - United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:04 am
Vying to replace him are Migna Sanchez-Llorens and Manny Segarra.MIGNA SANCHEZ-LLORENS ..... [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Sanchez, No. 07-30578 Where, at the time of sentencing there is no guideline in effect for the particular offense of conviction, and the Sentencing Commission has promulgated a proposed guideline applicable to the offense of conviction, the district court's failure to consider the proposed guideline when sentencing the defendant may result in reversible plain error. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]