Search for: "Sanders v. Department of Veterans Affairs"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2008, 4:52 pm
Sanders [oral arguments transcript, PDF], the Court considered whether the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) [official website] bears the burden of proof that it adequately informed a veteran of the information needed to process a benefits claim [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 2:11 pm
Sanders, No. 07-1209 In an application for veterans’ disability benefits, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s holding that the Department of Veterans Affairs erred in denying benefits is reversed, where the Federal Circuit’s “harmless-error” framework conflicts with 38 U.S.C. section 7261(b)(2)’s requirement that the Veterans Court take [...] [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:24 pm
Sanders, the Court will consider which party - the Department of Veterans Affairs or, alternatively, the claimant - bears the burden of showing prejudice when the VA fails to provide the notice required by the VCAA. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:56 pm
Both claims were again denied, but in each case the Department of Veterans Affairs failed to provide all of the appropriate notice required by the VCAA. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:45 pm
Law Week summary of the holding: In reviewing veterans' claims on appeal from the Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims where the Department of Veterans Affairs has failed to provide a veteran with a certain kind of statutorily required notice, the Federal Circuit is required by 38 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims held, in Haas v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:02 pm
Sanders - whether the Federal Circuit erred in finding that a failure of the Department of Veterans' Affairs to give notice to benefits' claimants must be presumed to be prejudicial. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Sanders (07-1209), involving who bears the burden of showing the failure of the Department of Veterans Affairs to give statutorily required notice to benefits claimants was or was not prejudicial. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:34 pm
Sanders, No. 07-1209 In an application for veterans' disability benefits, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's holding that the Department of Veterans Affairs erred in denying benefits is reversed, where the Federal Circuit's "harmless-error" framework conflicts with 38 U.S.C. section 7261(b)(2)'s requirement that the Veterans Court take "due account of the rule of prejudicial error. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
Sanders Issue: Whether courts must presume the failure of the Department of Veterans' Affairs to give notice to benefits' claimants to be prejudicial. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Sanders (07-1209), involving who bears the burden of showing the failure of the Department of Veterans Affairs to give statutorily required notice to benefits claimants was or was not prejudicial. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
Sanders (07-1209), the Court rejected, by a vote of six to three, the Federal Circuit’s “harmless-error” framework for the review of claims decisions by the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 1:44 pm
Sanders (07-1209) where the Federal Circuit found the failure of the Department of Veterans' Affairs to give notice to benefits' claimants must be presumed to be prejudicial (filings available here). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
Department of Veterans Affairs’ duty to give a veteran full notice of the information that will be needed in order to weigh a benefits claim (Peake v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Sanders Issue: Whether courts must presume the failure of the Department of Veterans' Affairs to give notice to benefits' claimants to be prejudicial. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am
She recovered anywhere from $80 to $130 million a year for the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
