Search for: "Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp." Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Clothes make the man, and the wage-and-hour lawsuit
11 Nov 2013, 4:31 am by Jon Hyman
United States Steel Corp., which asks under what circumstances employers are required to treat as compensable the time employees spend putting on and taking off protective clothing. [read post]
Ohio Employer's Law Blog - http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/
This week’s argument audio
8 Nov 2013, 2:13 pm by Oyez Project
United States Steel Corporation Walden v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Corp. — FLSA Section 203(o)
6 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Adam Kielich
This month the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments on Sandifer v. [read post]
The Kielich Law Firm Blog - http://kielichlawfirm.com/blog
Wednesday round-up
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
United States Steel Corp., in which the Court is considering what constitutes “changing clothes” for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Tuesday round-up
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Sandifer v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
What are Clothes?
4 Nov 2013, 8:12 pm by Orin Kerr
United States Steel Corp. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The Meaning of "Clothes" To Be Decided by U.S. Supreme Court
28 Feb 2013, 2:27 pm by Elizabeth Arce
United States Steel Corp. which was decided by the U.S. [read post]
California Public Agency Labor and Employment Blog - http://www.calpublicagencylaboremploymentblog.com
Putting On Work Clothes And Walking From Locker Room Not Compensable For Overtime Pay
21 Jun 2012, 10:47 am
Sandifer v. [read post]
San Francisco Employment Lawyer Blog - http://www.sanfranciscoemploymentlawyer-blog.com/
Seventh Circuit Disagrees With the Sixth Circuit in Construing Compensable Time Under The Fair Labor Standards Act
17 May 2012, 2:36 pm by Amy Cadle Hocevar
United States Steel Corp. [read post]
Sixth Circuit Appellate Blog - http://www.sixthcircuitappellateblog.com/
Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Corp: 7th Circuit Disagrees with Sixth Circuit and DOL; Clothes-Changing Subject to FLSA Section 203(o) is not a Principal Activity that Starts the Continuous Workday
11 May 2012, 12:56 pm by Jim Boudreau
United States Steel Corp., 632 F. [read post]
GT LE Blog - http://www.gtleblog.com/
M.D.Tenn.: Even If Time Spent Donning And Doffing A Uniform Is Non-Compensable Under § 203(o), It Might Still Start The Workday Under § 254(a) And The Continuous Workday Rule
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am by Andrew Frisch
United States Steel Corp., 632 F.Supp.2d 398, 412-13 (W.D.Pa.2009) (“Section 203(o) relates to the compensability of time spent donning, doffing, and washing in the collective-bargaining process. [read post]
Overtime Law Blog | FLSA Decisions - http://overtimelaw.wordpress.com