Search for: "Sandra Peters v. Wal-Mart"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2007, 2:47 pm
(I think the answer can be Scalia's in Wal-mart: given the costs of sorting out the few confusing uses from the many nonconfusing ones in a defined subset of cases, the game isn't worth the candle. [read post]
