Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 561 - 580
of 580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2006, 6:56 am
Or, we might see more constitutional amendment activity, which might not be a bad thing considering, per Sandy Levinson, how undemocratic the American constitution is. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 8:05 am
Perhaps you are feeling overwhelmed by the blog blitz about Sandy Levinson's new book, Our Undemocratic Constitution. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 11:02 am
On December 4, 2006, my dear friend Sandy Levinson came over to Hoover DC's offices at Dupont Circle and talked about his new book, Our Undemocratic Constitution. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
I wish Sandy had said something about Eisgruber's argument, but I will take a stab myself. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:15 pm
Master of the Blog Balkin has encouraged me to post some comments I prepared for the "schmooze" on Sandy Levinson's book. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 4:17 am
Thematically, the coference is loosesly organized around the notion of a 18th Century Constitution in a 21st Century World, with special reference to Sandy Levinson's new book: Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It) [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 3:51 am
Sandy Levinson and I are about to go to Baltimore today for an annual gathering of political scientists and law professors interested in constitutional law, affectionately called the "Schmooze. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 11:11 pm
In a rare show of agreement, both liberal constitutional law scholar Sandy Levinson and conservative Michael Rappaport argue that the the 1947 presidential Succession in Office Act should be... [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 5:24 pm
SANDY LEVINSON: "This is the perfect time for Speaker-designate Pelosi to announce that she will sponsor a bill, ideally with the outgoing Speaker Dennis Hastert, to revert to the older Succession in Office Act that was replaced in 1947 with the present one. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 12:59 am
I don't usually agree with Sandy Levinson, but his post on this important subject is an exception. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 10:25 am
One of them, Sandy Levinson, is among the most industrious contributors to this blog space. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 8:30 am
Michael Kinsley last week in the New York Times quickly dismissed Sandy Levinson's call for a new constitutional convention on grounds that, while we might get rid of an undemocratic Senate, the risk was too great that we would also get rid of the democratic First Amendment. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 5:15 pm
Sandy Levinson writes at Balkinization: I note that both Virginia and Montana have third party candidates for the Senate who have won enough votes possibly to affect the election. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 5:35 am
Sandy Levinson and I have just published a new article, Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship, in the Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 4:16 pm
Sandy Levinson has an interesting post on a speech made by New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse and the reactions it provoked. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 11:46 am
Jack Balkin, here; David Luban, here; Sandy Levinson, here; Marty Lederman, here. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 4:28 pm
Readers of Balkinization (and numerous academic listservs) will no doubt be familiar with Professor Sandy Levinson's frequent phillipics against the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 5:21 am
The blog boasts an all-star team of contributors, including law profs Cass Sunstein and Sandy Levinson. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
In addition, if there are any other cases from the 2005 Supplement that you'd like to see included on conlaw.net, just send Sandy Levinson or me an e-mail and we will do our best to make sure they are included as well. [read post]
28 Nov 2005, 4:10 pm
But the reason I professed puzzlement that no one had discussed is partly that other people have raised it in conversation, not to endorse it, but to consider the idea because it is relevant - Sandy Levinson, for one, in discussions over his book on torture (I don't recall whether Dershowitz, for example, addresses this directly in his discussion of torture in that book). [read post]
