Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 161 - 180
of 580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2010, 7:00 pm
(Ilya Somin) In a post commenting on the controversy generated by our earlier exchange (see here and here), Sandy Levinson writes: It is obvious that contemporary libertarians are prone to blame individuals for most (even if .... not all) things that befall them; political liberals are far more likely to offer structuralist explanations that have the consequence of exempting individuals from “responsibility” for much of their fate. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
Ashley Moran and Richard Albert We are thrilled to share short papers resulting from the first roundtable discussion convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series bringing together scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sanford “Sandy” Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
Sandy Levinson and I have just submitted a draft of our new article on the Dred Scott case to SSRN. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:31 am
Sandy Levinson and I have posted our latest article, The Dangerous Thirteenth Amendment, on SSRN. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Update, October 5: As I say, I was only channeling Sandy Levinson on this one. [read post]
5 May 2007, 7:33 pm
This New York Times article discusses the role that liberal law professors played in promoting the notion that the Second Amendment protects an individual right, including in particular, a 1989 Yale Law Journal article by Sandy Levinson, The Embarrassing Second Amendment. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
Following my previous post on why for-profit corporations cannot be persons for purposes of the Thirteenth Amendment, Sandy Levinson reminded me of another important fact. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:55 am
Sandy Levinson and I have just posted our latest paper, Constitutional Crises, on SSRN. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:49 am
Sandy Levinson has supplied an energetic critique of the features of our government that are “hard-wired” into the Constitution. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
No, this is not a Rick roll Rick Perry apparently supports something like Paul Carrington's proposal-- joined by legal academics across the ideological spectrum, including Sandy Levinson and myself--for 18 year "term limits" for Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 8:27 am
Here, Dahlia Lithwick of Slate has her thoughts on the Chief Justice's year-end report calling the current state of judicial pay a "constitutional crisis;" Dahlia also links to several other reactions, including those of Matthew Frank, Sandy Levinson, Doug Powers, and Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
But lest I sound too elitist, I would like to point out Sandy Levinson's excellent commentary on Tiger Woods's return to professional golf. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:30 am
It closes with a response from Sandy Levinson (University of Texas at Austin). [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
I wish Sandy had said something about Eisgruber's argument, but I will take a stab myself. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:00 am
Next follows a terrific group of commentators-- who have all decided to go their own ways-- including Mark Graber (Maryland), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Michael Lind (Texas), Cynthia Nicoletti (Virginia), Ilya Somin (George Mason), Robert Tsai (American University), and myself. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
The roundtable includes essays from Samuel Levine (Touro College) on parallels between Jewish legal interpretation and other forms of literary interpretation, Robert Pushaw (Pepperdine University) on contextualist approaches to legal interpretation, Stanley Fish (University of Texas at Austin) on movies’ portrayal of law, Richard Weisberg (Yeshiva University) on channeling Sandy’s inner Faust and a poethics of constitutional law, and Sandy Levinson (University… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:29 am
This question was posed for me by Dan Solove’s post on “Losing Our Religion,” as well as by the juxtaposition between Jack’s book and Sandy Levinson’s Our Undemocratic Constitution, works that share many sympathies yet appear to reach opposite conclusions. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:57 am
In this article with Sandy Levinson and on the pages of this blog I've been arguing that the United States is gradually moving from a National Security State to a National Surveillance State, which uses new information technologies and both public action and private cooperation to govern through the collection, collation, and analysis of information obtained through a wide variety of surveillance practices. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:34 am
" (H/T and commentary: Sandy Levinson). [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 5:35 am
Sandy Levinson and I have just published a new article, Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship, in the Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities. [read post]
