Search for: "Santa Clara County v. Superior Court" Results 201 - 220 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm by Dawn Goulet, Associate
County of Santa Clara The controversy was reignited in part by the United States Supreme Court’s recent refusal to hear the appeal of a California Supreme Court decision holding that the government can hire private attorneys on a contingenct basis under certain circumstances. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 50.) [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
A 9th Circuit panel ruled Wednesday that state sovereign immunity does not extend to a private contractor hired by the Santa Clara County DA's office to go after individuals who passed bad checks. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
For example, a false statement made in a court filing is subject to the absolute privilege. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
Superior Court (Santa Clara County), the Court faced the issue of whether a bankrupt company could maintain an action for trade secret misappropriation when that company had sold its “trade secrets” in connection with the bankruptcy. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
Superior Court (Santa Clara County) (IP Law Blog)   US Patent Reform The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 (Patent Baristas) (Inventive Step) (271 Patent Blog) (IP Watch) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) First to disclose: A caveat to the Patent Reform Act of 2010 (Patently-O) House leadership says it lacked ‘adequate input’ on Senate Patent Reform Bill (Patent Docs) Who cares about health care… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
Superior Court (Santa Clara County) (IP Law Blog)   US Patent Reform The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 (Patent Baristas) (Inventive Step) (271 Patent Blog) (IP Watch) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) First to disclose: A caveat to the Patent Reform Act of 2010 (Patently-O) House leadership says it lacked ‘adequate input’ on Senate Patent Reform Bill (Patent Docs) Who cares about health care… [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Staff, Taunton Daily Gazette, April 30, 2010 The owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and a site foreman who worked for the same company, have pled guilty in New Bedford Superior Court to charges they violated the Massachusetts Clean Air Act by failing to improperly remove asbestos from properties in Attleboro and North Attleborough. [read post]