Search for: "Santa Clara Department of Correction" Results 81 - 100 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by INFORRM
University of Ottawa professor Michael Geist had been one of five Canadian signatories on a letter initiated by Santa Clara University law professor Eric Goldman to the three NAFTA negotiators urging that the new Agreement contain protection from liability for online intermediaries for third party online content, similar to Section 230. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am by Eugene Volokh
This includes remains of ancestors of the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe, which comprises "all of the known surviving American Indian lineages aboriginal to the San Francisco Bay region who trace their ancestry through the Missions Santa Clara, San Jose, and San Francisco. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:06 am by Bill Marler
Trevor’s mother, Erin Parisi Simmons, said she spoke within two days to the Santa Clara Health Department and discussed possible sources of the illness. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed February 24, 2023, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 5) reversed a judgment upholding the adequacy of the EIR for the University of California, Berkeley’s long range campus development plan (“LRDP”) and a controversial housing development project at the historic People’s Park. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Wilkinson, Youngstown News, March 31, 2010 A&L Salvage Landfill has agreed to more than a $4 million settlement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency to correct long-standing problems at its closed landfill. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
County of San Diego (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 55: An agreement between the county of San Diego and the Department of Corrections under which the county identified potential locations for a state prison reentry facility in exchange for preference in the awards of state financing of county jail facilities did not constitute a commitment to a definite course of action. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Data Protection and Data Privacy Marketplace of Ideas, Privacy, and Digital Audiences, Notre Dame Law Review, Forthcoming, Alexander Tsesis A Guide to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, Lydia de la Torre, Santa Clara University Defamation [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The EPA and health department had sued the companies, claiming the slag-dumping process at the mill violates the federal Clean Air Act. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 which upheld the practice of negotiating a term sheet at the outset of project processing. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am by Jasmine Joseph
Amar University of California, Davis - School of Law Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2009 Abstract In this essay, the author briefly explore Robert Courts cases in two areas where business law intersects with my primary field of scholarship, the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm by admin
A major tributary of the Santa Clara River, Sespe Creek is a critical habitat for Southern California steelhead. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm by admin
A major tributary of the Santa Clara River, Sespe Creek is a critical habitat for Southern California steelhead. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1044. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Bell, No. 05-5132, 05-6219 Habeas petition was properly dismissed where: 1) State court applied an incorrect standard of proof in denying death row inmate's ineffective assistance of counsel claim, but it reached the correct outcome; 2) the excluded testimony of a co-defendant was of a cumulative nature; and 3) the prosecutor committed harmless error in minimizing the jury's role in determining the appropriateness of a death sentence. .. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]