Search for: "Santa Clara Valley Water District v. San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2021, 4:47 pm
Santa Clara Valley Water District v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:22 pm
The judicial development was the First District’s December 29, 2020 published decision in Santa Clara Valley Water District v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
Petitioner, Santa Clara Valley Water District (“District”), filed suit challenging the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board’s (the “Board”) addition of new mitigation requirements when issuing an order adopting Waste Discharge Requirements (“WDRs”) for the District’s flood control project. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1067. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
East Bay Regional Park District (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 353. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management District Thresholds of Significance: In June 2010, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District adopted the first ever numeric thresholds for GHG. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Around the same time, the Regional Water Quality Control Board took interest in the site due to downstream stream contamination, potentially as a result of runoff from the horse and cattle facilities. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (2020) ____ Cal.App.5th ____, and my 1/6/21 post on it can be found here. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Around the same time, the Regional Water Quality Control Board took interest in the site due to downstream stream contamination, potentially as a result of runoff from the horse and cattle facilities. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
State Water Resources Control Bd., (December 15, 2021) 2021 Cal.App.LEXIS 1052. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
District Court in Roanoke. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Michael Aubele, Valley News Dispatch, April 27, 2010 The federal Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department want a federal judge to sign off on an agreement with Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and Harsco Corp. intended to control slag dust at the Ludlum steel mill in Natrona. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
In Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
In Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
“It’s one of the most important threats to water quality right now,” said Miyoko Sakashita, a senior attorney at the group’s San Francisco office. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
That means elevating buildings, making taller and stronger dams and seawalls, rerouting water systems, restricting certain developments, changing farming practices, and ultimately moving people, plants, and animals out of harm’s way. [read post]
