Search for: "Santana v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
” Following this line of reasoning, the High Court later stated in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:04 pm
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/currentsct.htmlPetition for certiorari was filed in Santana v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
Rial v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:15 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 9:03 pm
" Santana, 427 U.S. at 43. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Nineteen other defendants were arrested in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Florida, and Texas and were expected to appear in federal courts in those states. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Santana supra at 212-213; See, Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:11 am
In First National v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:07 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am
Cruz Santana, No. 03 CV 6299 JG, 2005 WL 67094, at *8 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:44 am
Santana… More post-release control follies: in State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 pm
State v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
” Lluch v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Again, this opinion is valid only for the State of Massachusetts and not Utah. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:53 am
PNC Bank, 792 A.2d 602, 607-08 (Pa.Super.Ct.2002), and our Court has interpreted the rule to apply to all Consumer Protection Law subsections, see Santana Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
