Search for: "Satoshi Do" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2021, 3:58 am by China Law Blog
At Harris Bricken, we keep close tabs on what is happening around the world, and we know that our friends and clients do, as well. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:00 am by Joe Mullin
" Now, Nakamoto and his lawyer Ethan Kirschner have made clear they'd like to sue Newsweek over the story—but they need more money to do it. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:35 am by Timothy B. Lee
Bitcoin's still anonymous inventor, who went by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, figured out a completely new way for a decentralized network to reach a consensus about a shared transaction ledger. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 11:45 am by Timothy B. Lee
Last year, we wrote about Satoshi Dice, a Bitcoin-based online "slot machine." [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 10:50 pm
Satoshi Tada, funcionário de um escritório no Japão, paga compras, ganha comida de graça e obtém descontos em lojas apenas movimentando seu celular. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 2:08 pm by Adam Levitin
If A pays B 50 Satoshi (that's the subunit of a bitcoin), what prevents A from then paying C with the same 50 Satoshi? [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:05 am by Jonathan Bailey
Wright is claiming that he wrote the original code under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:42 am by Stewart Baker
In the interview, Jamie Smith first debunks rumors that she is, in fact, Satoshi Nakamoto, the original creator of Bitcoin (“We are all Satoshi,” Jamie graciously explains.) [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:46 am by Stewart Baker
 What exactly does the DNI’s Civil Liberties Protection Officer do? [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 6:36 am by Ed Felten
All of this suggests an obvious question: If the rules of Bitcoin can be changed, and have been changed, then how do rule changes happen? [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 1:14 pm by Nedim Malovic
Do not take it for grantedby Paolo Maria GangiEleonora Rosati explained, on November 11, 2022, in a very good article on this blog, how the Rome Court of First Instance issued an injunction in favour of the Juventus soccer team because “an unauthorized third-party, blockchain-based platform Blockeras, had minted, advertised, and offered for sale NFTs and other digital content relating to images representing said Juventus trade marks, as well as the image of former Juventus footballer… [read post]