Search for: "Saunders v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am by Tia Sewell
Coleman Saunders summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:32 am by Tia Sewell
Coleman Saunders summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Philipp, can read Coleman Saunders’s summary of oral argument in that case here. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Murphy, Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Work of the International Law Commission International DecisionsMaiko Meguro, State of the Netherlands v. [read post]
Vance that a sitting president does not enjoy absolute immunity from state court proceedings, New York judge Verna Saunders denied the delay and ordered the trial to move forward. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:57 am by Brian Shiffrin
Brown, 21 A.D.2d 738, 249 N.Y.S.2d 922; State v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 5:29 am by Gerard Magliocca
Saunders, an 1827 Supreme Court case which concluded that states could enact bankruptcy laws that applied prospectively. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Joe Biden has emerged as the likely Democratic nominee following Bernie Saunders dropping out of the democratic presidential candidate race on 8 April 2020. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Lachaux, it will often be best to leave the matter for trial (see, for example, Steyn J, in James v Saunders [2019] EWHC 3265 (QB) at [16]-[17]), although as indicated by Warby J in Hamilton v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 59 (QB) there will be cases where the issue can sensibly be dealt with at a preliminary trial. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J handed down judgment after a meaning trial in the case of James v Saunders [2019] EWHC 3265 (QB). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:08 am by Lauren E. Quigley
Lauren Saunders, associate director of the National Consumer Law Center, stated that “[the] OCC proposal will encourage predatory lenders to try to use rent-a-bank schemes with rogue out-of-state banks to evade state laws that prohibit 160% loans. [read post]