Search for: "Savage v. Ohio Supreme Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 7:33 pm
The Supreme Court decision in Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am
Ohio (excluded evidence unconstitutionally obtained), Gideon v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
Ohio, the Texas v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued decisions in three cases. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Tim Wu argues that Monday’s decision in Ohio v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
” The court also ruled 8-1 in Sveen v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
Beth Farmer analyzes Monday’s argument in Ohio v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in Ohio v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
Philip Randolph Institute, in which the Supreme Court will decide whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance process violates federal voter-registration laws, We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 6:20 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Husted v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
Yesterday the court heard argument in Husted v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
Philip Randolph Institute, which will be argued next week and in which the Supreme Court will decide whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance process violates federal voter-registration laws, reporting that “[t]he core of Husted involves a tricky detail of statutory interpretation” and that “[f]or decades, the Department of Justice (DOJ) understood the law the way the challengers do[, b]ut in a rare about-face the DOJ under Donald Trump now… [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am
” In an op-ed for the Akron Beacon Journal, David Gans contends that “Ohio’s voter purge [at issue in Husted v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
” At Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports on yesterday’s confession by the court “that it had almost drummed the wrong lawyer out of the Supreme Court bar. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case: United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
Blatt, which was just noted a few days ago on the Westlaw Bulletin), the West Virginia Supreme Court held that such breed-specific presumptions, if they are to exist, are for the legislature and not for courts to develop. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Anne Traum weighs in on Ohio v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Hendrickson) for the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), David Savage in the Los Angeles Times, and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” In Ohio v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:01 pm
Supreme Court Reconsiders Career Criminal Law: In Johnson v. [read post]
