Search for: "Save Our Residential Environment v. City of West Hollywood (1992)"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
” The Court further noted that CEQA’s and the exhaustion doctrine’s requirements and concerns are not served by requiring proof “when there is no real dispute that the requirement was in fact met” (Save Our Residential Environment v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
City of West Hollywood (2008) 45 Cal.4th 116 (discussed in our earlier blogs; For CEQA, Project Commitment Is Still A Question Of Fact and Too Early or Too Late for CEQA Review: Two Appellate Decisions Bracket the Fundamental Question of Timing) but tempered by later decisions such as Cedar Fair L.P. v. [read post]
