Search for: "Save the Bay, Inc., Petitioner, v. Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
This summary provides brief updates on recent environmental cases, legislation, and administrative actions in 2020. 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Citing seminal CEQA timing cases Save Tara v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Delaware Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Save Our Big Trees v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
Lawson Rock & Oil, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
UPDATE Lead Agency/Responsible Agency We Advocate Thorough Environmental Review v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Thus, under Save Tara v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
In Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
In Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Exemptions Protect Telegraph Hill v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
EXEMPTIONS Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
