Search for: "Sayles v Ferone"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2021, 3:02 am
Since RFL had not yet been retained at the time of the LIMGA shareholders’ alleged wrongful acts, RFL could not have participated in or aided and abetted those actions (see Sayles v Ferone, 137 AD3d 486). [read post]
