Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2012, 2:27 pm
In an interview to be aired on C-SPAN next Sunday, Justice Scalia defended his dissent in part in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:49 am
From the sounds of the on-the-ground reports I am getting, it seems that United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
UPDATED ON JUNE 26, 2013: In a landmark decision penned by Justice Kennedy, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissenting), the United States Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection pursuant to the Fifth Amendment in the case United States v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 8:53 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
United States on April 25. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 2:13 pm
United States, the cell site location information case). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 7:18 am
United States, the Alabama immigration enforcement law case. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:20 pm
., I have been researching the last three terms of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
Thanks SCOTUSBlog for putting up the link to the oral argument transcript in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:32 am
On November 13, 2012 the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:58 pm
The post Justice Scalia's Dissent in <i>Dickerson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
United States Steel Corporation. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
United States Steel Corporation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:04 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:04 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:24 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 577–79 (2003), and United States v. [read post]