Search for: "Scarborough v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 1:41 pm by WIMS
Scarborough Citizens alleged that easements conveyed by the State on the parcel of land violate the law. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
The warning states: Consumer protection: The string [.attorney/.lawyer] is linked to a regulated market sector, and [applicant] does not appear to have proposed sufficient mechanisms to minimise potential consumer harm. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am by Robert D. Williams
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:11 am
 Further, the Scarborough decision cites to Davis v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:01 am by Sean Quirk
The China Coast Guard continues to deny Philippine fishermen access to Scarborough Shoal. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Carter, 68 AD3d 750 [2d Dept 20091; Scarborough v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP, 63 AD3d 153[4th Dept]], rearg. denied, 66 AD3d 1.50 [2009]). [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 1:37 pm
  United   States, 546 U.S. 12, 126 S.Ct. 403 (2005), and Kontrick v. [read post]