Search for: "Schaefer v. Schaefer" Results 21 - 40 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, an escrow agent can be held liable for . . . breach of fiduciary duty as escrowee” (Takayama v Schaefer, 240 AD2d 21, 25 [1998] [internal quotation marks and [*4]citations omitted]). [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
., Editor, First Reference In Thoma v Schaefer Elevator Components Inc., 2019 BCSC 100 (CanLII), the British Columbia Supreme Court re-affirms the need for employers to establish and communicate clear and explicit rules when discretionary bonuses form part of an organization’s compensation scheme. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Friedman, “Legal Systems Very Different from Ours”: pirates, prisoners, gypsies, Amish, imperial Chinese, Jewish, Islamic, saga-period Icelandic, Somali, early Irish, Plains Indians, 18th century English, and ancient Athenian [Michael Huemer, Reason] If the Supreme Court is going to let police stop your car on a pretext, they should at least insist that there *be* a pretext [Jonathan Blanks on Sievers v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
” [Naomi Schaefer Riley, City Journal, earlier here, here, etc.] [read post]