Search for: "Schatz v. U.s"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am
Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997). [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 12:03 pm
Recently, nearly every week brings a new effort to undercut or overhaul a key U.S. law—47 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
The OECD Fair Information Practice Principles, which underlie many privacy laws and frameworks in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere, articulate a “collection limitation principle. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:54 am
Brian Schatz and Republican Sen. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am
The money followed a legal but circuitous route turbocharged by the 2014 ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am
Schatz and Thune, both considered pragmatic senators. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:15 am
” [28] Defined as “designated payment systems”, the UIGEA covers any system that that facilitates money transfers that the US government determines to be used by illegal gambling sites.[29] Despite the UIEGA , sites like PokerStars have publically announced that it will ignore the Act and continue operations as usual, claiming that the law applies to games of chance, and that poker is a game of skill and therefore not regulated.[30] Recently, the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
Brian Schatz (D-HI) and John Thune (R-SD), is a huge step forward. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
