Search for: "Scherer v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2010, 12:25 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued July 30, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Scherer, II v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:18 am
Unlike cases in other states, Long's unemployment period had extended for over four months, advising against a finding of "good cause" that might otherwise be found had the unemployment been brief. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:19 pm
Contents include:EditorialTom Grant, Argument and Decision in a Developed SystemArticlesCarlos Espósito, Of Plumbers and Social Architects: Elements and Problems of the Judgment of the International Court of Justice in Jurisdictional Immunities of States Andrea Bianchi, Gazing at the Crystal Ball (again): State Immunity and Jus Cogens beyond Germany v Italy Geir Ulfstein, Awarding Compensation in a Fragmented Legal System: The Diallo Case Annemarieke… [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 1:25 pm by James J. Scherer
As KJK has previously covered, earlier this year, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) delivered a landmark ruling on the reach of the protections afforded by the Clean Water Act (CWA) in Sacket v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 9:05 am
The ruling affirmed an order which prevented defense counsel from publishing the name of a sexual abuse victim in order to investigate the victim's credibility - Matter of Fischetti v Scherer, 2007 NY Slip Op 06174. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Abercrombie & Fitch, (June 10, 2016).Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Review of Beyond Church and State by Matthew Scherer, (Augustinian Studies 47:1 (2016) 114–118).Danieli Evans, Religious Objections to the Death Penalty after Hobby Lobby, (Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2015).Abner S. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 5:17 pm by David Oscar Markus
The Court found that “[w]hen we read Article V, section 8 together with article V, section 11, the only reasonable conclusion is that the Bar eligibility requirement attaches at the time of appointment. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Wade” by Michael Scherer, Josh Dawsey, Caroline Kitchener, and Rachel Roubein (Washington Post) for MSN Canada: “MLA’s Motions to Improve Alberta Lobbyist Act Rejected by Committee” by Michelle Bellefontaine (CBC) for MSN The post Monday’s LobbyComply News Roundup appeared first on State and Federal Communications. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
See Boyce v Gumley-Haft, Inc., 82 AD3d 491 (1st Dept 2011); Scherer v Golub Corp., 101 AD3d 1286 (3d Dept 2012); Hutter, "Speaking Agent Hearsay Exception: Time to Clarify, if Not Abandon," New York Law Journal, June 6, 2013, Pg. 3, col. 1, Vol. 249, No. 108. [read post]