Search for: "Schindler Elevator Company" Results 41 - 50 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am by Lyle Denniston
Tinklenberg (09-1498), asking the Court to clarify how to count the days that are allowed to lapse before an individual charged with a federal crime must be put on trial, or have the charges dismissed; and Schindler Elevator Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
§ 157(b)(2)(C) contravenes congressional intent; (2) whether Congress may authorize core jurisdiction over debtors’ compulsory counterclaims to proofs of claim; and (3) whether the Ninth Circuit contravened Supreme Court precedent and created a circuit split by holding that Congress cannot constitutionally authorize non-Article III bankruptcy judges to enter final judgment on all compulsory counterclaims to proofs of claim.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for… [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Court returned the case to lower courts to explore the specifics of a potential remedy in this case. ** In Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:24 am by Stefanie Levine
The '094 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Schindler Elevator Corp and Invention v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:24 am by Stefanie Levine
The '094 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Schindler Elevator Corp and Invention v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm by Law Lady
STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 3rd District.Insurance -- Homeowners -- Hurricane damage to home -- Attorney's fees -- Insurer's post-suit payment of additional policy proceeds entitles insured to section 627.428 attorney's fees where the insurer wrongfully caused its insured to resort to litigation in order to resolve a conflict with its insurer when it was within the company's power to resolve it -- Error to enter summary… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:12 am by Adam Chandler
Greene (consolidated), as well as Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]