Search for: "Schlesinger v. Councilman"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Under a theory derived from Marbury v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
Roberts, held this matter in abeyance under the abstention doctrine articulated in Schlesinger v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:30 am
Councilman and federalism interests favor abstention under Younger v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 11:47 am
First, the appeal comes to the court from a D.C. district court order not on the merits, but abstaining from the merits on an application of Schlesinger v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:36 am
The amicus argues that abstention – the route taken by the district court – premised on Schlesinger v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
District Judge Richard Roberts, who held that he was bound by Schlesinger v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:00 am
Accordingly, each has abstained under the principles of Schlesinger v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:00 pm
Councilman Abstention The harder question is the one to which Peter rightly devotes more space, namely whether the district court ought to abstain from hearing Nashiri’s claim under Schlesinger v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:36 am
In a pair of rulings, Judges Robertson and Bates purported to sidestep that constitutional question, holding instead that “abstention” was appropriate under the Supreme Court’s 1975 decision in Schlesinger v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 12:23 pm
See Schlesinger v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 11:35 pm
In Schlesinger v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:24 pm
Judge John Bates (D.D.C.) ruled yesterday that Guantanamo detainee Omar Khadr could file a second amended habeas petition, but that the court would again abstain from hearing it under Schlesinger v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
The petition was stayed under a criteria set forth by the US Supreme Court's 1975 decision in Schlesinger v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:40 am
Judge Boyle finds, quoting Councilman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:04 pm
Chief Judge Moore concluded that “the Court is bound to abstain from intervention based on longstanding precedent,” relying on Schlesinger v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Schilder, 340 U.S. 128 (1950), and Schlesinger v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:48 am
The judge held off by relying upon the Supreme Court’s 1975 decision in Schlesinger v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:25 am
"On the merits, the Judge's reasoning looks destined for appeal and a showdown over Schlesinger v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 1:55 pm
Bishop v. [read post]
