Search for: "Schmerber v. California"
Results 41 - 60
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2013, 1:17 pm
While Missouri v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 3:25 pm
Regardless, San Diego and other California law enforcement agencies have been forcibly taking blood from drivers without a warrant, citing the landmark case from 1966, Schmerber v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
California47 years ago, the Supreme Court decided Schmerber v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:22 pm
Rochin v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:41 pm
The case technically hinged on the interpretation of a 1966 case, Schmerber v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Schmerber v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
Because there was nothing unusual about the case, the Missouri Supreme Court distinguished the 1966 Supreme Court case of Schmerber v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:18 pm
In the 1966 case of Schmerber v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
California (1966). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
California (1966). [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 12:58 pm
California. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:53 am
"); Schmerber v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:40 am
Interpreting the United States Supreme Court decision Schmerber v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:20 am
Indeed, this distinction between testimonial facts and physical evidence is expressly recognized by the Supreme Court in Selvi, supra, para 137, as also the American Supreme Court in Armando Schmerber v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:07 am
(My third favorite is Schmerber v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:17 am
(See Schmerber v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:03 pm
Schmerber v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:05 am
In Schmerber v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:21 am
March 16, 2012): An order compelling an individual to provide corporeal evidence, such as blood or saliva for DNA analysis, constitutes a search and seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment (see Skinner v Railway Labor Executives' Assn., 489 U.S. 602, 618; Schmerber v California, 384 U.S. 757, 767; Matter of Abe A., 56 NY2d 288, 295). [read post]
