Search for: "Schmidt v. Pension Board"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2019, 2:23 pm
The complaint in Northern California Pipe Trades Pension Plan v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am
Retirement Plan for General Employees v McGraw-Hill Cos., 120 AD3d 1052, 2014 NY Slip Op 06154 [1st Dept Sept. 11, 2014], in which the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the trial court’s ruling dismissing a books-and-records proceeding brought against McGraw-Hill, and held that the petitioning pension fund’s stated purpose of the requested inspection, to investigate the board’s oversight of McGraw-Hill’s… [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
16th-century painting of a civil law notary, by Flemish painter Quentin MassysGlobal consensus appears to be moving steadily toward the embrace of a principle touching on "the ethical considerations which a lawyer should take into account in the field of business and human rights when advising clients. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
NLRB v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
Judgments There have been a number of media law judgments handed down during the Summer Vacation: SWS v Department of Work and Pensions (No 2) [2018] EWHC 2282 (QB), Warby J has provided a succinct summary of the legal principles applying to claimant’s requests for anonymity. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo MSN – Michael Schmidt (New York Times) | Published: 11/5/2019 A critical witness in the impeachment inquiry offered Congress substantial new testimony, revealing he told a top Ukrainian official that the country likely would not receive American military aid unless it publicly committed to investigations President Trump wanted. [read post]
