Search for: "Schofield v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
A California state trial court has issued a tentative ruling (full text), subject to change if either party requests oral argument, in Diocese of San Joaquin v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:55 am
Contents include: ArticlesTommy Koh & Hao Duy Phan, The Asian Way to Settle Disputes Ian Townsend-Gault, Sustainable and Sound: First Principles for Addressing Maritime Jurisdictional Issues and Disputes Clive Schofield & Richard Schofield, Testing the Waters: Charting The Evolution of Claims to and From Low-Tide Elevations and Artificial Islands under the Law of the Sea Genevieve Quirk & Quentin Hanich, Ocean Diplomacy: The Pacific Island Countries’ Campaign… [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
It goes back to the Schofield decision to ascertain just what those "neutral principles" are:As the Schofield Court recognized:These neutral principles include First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It also rejects the state's argument that the verdict form demonstrated jury confusion.The case is Saber v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 9:13 am
Contents include: The South China Sea Seokwoo Lee & Clive Schofield, Introduction to the Special Issue Nengye Liu & Md Saiful Karim, South China Sea after the Philippines v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:10 am by sally
Supreme Court G Hamilton (Tullochgribban Mains) Ltd v The Highland Council & Anor[2012] UKSC 31 (11 July 2012) ANS & Anor v ML [2012] UKSC 30 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) BA, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 1529 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Keay & Anor v Morris Homes (West Midlands) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 900 (11 July 2012) Holmes & Anor v Evans & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 941 (11 July 2012) BA & Ors… [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]