Search for: "School District No. 23 v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11"
Results 81 - 100
of 647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:00 pm
Bremerton School District, written by Arisa Herman (‘23) and Amaris Cuchanksi (‘23) and edited by Marisa Pagan-Figueroa (‘22).A special thank you to Adjunct Professor Michael Sliger, whom the students consulted for Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 4:02 am
Osmond Senior Living v Utah Department of Public Safety, 2018 WL 6131999 (UT App. 11/23/2018) [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Schwartz 11. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:56 am
The kids are back in school. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 2:41 pm
Kobylarz discusses Mark Lemley's change in position on obviousness in KSR v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
” Op. 11. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
” Op. 11. [read post]
14 May 2015, 5:46 pm
105 LRP 57524 (2d Cir. 11/23/05). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:29 pm
105 LRP 57524 (2d Cir. 11/23/05). [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:41 pm
Apr. 23, 2010)(Guzman)(education law, teacher disciplinary administrative appeals)PRESIDIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
Bender v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
In Acosta v Acosta, 2012 WL 2178982 (D.Minn.) [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:46 pm
Now, in Holt v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 6:45 am
Felony Complaint - People of the State of California v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois gave final approval to the $160 million settlement of Plaintiffs’ class claims in McReynolds, et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
California Appellate Districts, November 20, 2007 Garretson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:59 am
(10) Certain service-connected disability payments Any amount payable to an individual as a service-connected (within the meaning of section 101 (16) of title 38, United States Code) disability benefit under— (A) subchapter II, III, IV, V,,[1] or VI of chapter 11 of such title 38, or (B) chapter 13, 21, 23, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37, or 39 of such title 38 [read post]
