Search for: "Schult v. Schult"
Results 21 - 40
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2011, 3:17 am
Legal malpractice counterclaims face an uphill battle in attorney fee cases, and Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover ; 2011 NY Slip Op 00267 ; Decided on January 20, 2011 ; Appellate Division, First Department is no exception. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 10:13 am
The problem is, it probably will result in more litigation.The decision is Fancher v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:01 am
Resource Extraction: SEC Proposes to Adopt Rules Within 270 Days As we blogged about a few weeks ago, the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts – in Oxfam America v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm
In 1986, in a case called Ford v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Warkol are Partners at Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Warkol are Partners at Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
Click here for the full Schulte Roth & Zabel publication. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 11:20 am
Supreme Court's 2016 ruling in Hurst v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:10 pm
" And online at The Daily Beast, Jay Michaelson has an essay titled "Young v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:47 am
Schult, decided on May 23. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:26 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, & 05-549, EPA v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:11 am
Smith, Brian V. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:27 pm
In the recent case (Fadai v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
You may not have heard of the lawsuit Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:31 am
The case is entitled McKenzie v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 10:05 pm
ACS State Healthcare, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
The case, Apple v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:12 am
In last week’s case (Liu v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 3:47 am
This unambiguous written document constitutes documentary evidence that the attorney-client relationship between plaintiff and the Wallace defendants ended more than three years before plaintiff commenced this action (see Seaman v Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 176 AD3d 538, 539 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 6:52 am
Editor’s Note: The following post comes to us from Lawrence V. [read post]