Search for: "Schult v. Schult"
Results 61 - 80
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
Schulte, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
Schulte, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:28 am
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, No. 601566/04, 2008 WL 4065920, at *8 (N.Y. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:17 am
This unambiguous written document constitutes documentary evidence that the attorney-client relationship between plaintiff and the Wallace defendants ended more than three years before plaintiff commenced this action (see Seaman v Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 176 AD3d 538, 539 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:23 pm
In the recent case (Nieman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
We recently received this informative alert from our friends at Schulte Roth & Zabel detailing the comments made and what they might mean for companies going forward. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 12:04 pm
In today’s case (Boparai v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
In today’s case (Whelan v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:41 pm
Early Results of Study Indicate No Direct Link Between Hydraulic Fracturing and Groundwater Contamination - New Orleans attorney Keith Hall of Stone Pigman Walther Wittmann on the firm's Oil & Gas Law Brief In Defense of Color Trademarks: INTA Submits Amicus Brief in Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:03 am
.' "
OUTSIDE COUNSEL:
Divided Supreme Court Extends Reach of Confrontation ClauseMonday, July 20, 2009By Harry Sandick and Justin Mendelsohn"Harry Sandick, of counsel at Schulte Roth & Zabel, and Justin Mendelsohn, an associate at the firm, write that the Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:54 am
Sikora v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 2:35 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com
Schultes, appellant v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:33 am
Accordingly, the plaintiffs' claim pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 based upon the defendants' prior representation of Heartland is barred by the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata, as the plaintiffs had a full and fair opportunity to raise the issue before the Bankruptcy Court (see generally Lefkowitz v Schulte, Roth & Zabel, 279 AD2d 457 [2001]). [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:17 am
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, No. 601566/04, 2008 WL 4065920, at *8 (N.Y. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 3:23 am
In view of the conclusive evidence establishing the absence of legal representation by defendants on any personal injury action, the court incorrectly determined that the legal malpractice claim was timely under the continuous representation doctrine (see Pace v Horowitz, 190 AD3d 619 [1st Dept 2021]; Knobel v Wei Group, LLP, 160 AD3d 409, 410 [1st Dept 2018]) and that it was factually sustainable (see Binn v Muchnick, Golieb & Golieb, P.C., 180 AD3d 598, 599… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
In the case of KHS AG v Schulte, the ECJ held that, under the Directive, there is a limit to the length of time an employee on long-term sick leave can continue to carry over untaken annual leave. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:18 am
In this week’s case (Gu v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Brill, P.C., 25 AD3d 420, [1st Dept 2006]; Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500,501 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:12 am
Schulte, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Schult, 717 F.3d 119, 125–26 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting Ashcroft v. [read post]
