Search for: "Schultz v. Schultz"
Results 41 - 60
of 528
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2022, 2:22 pm
Schultz (1988) …. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 1:54 pm
And State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
Since the landmark Supreme Court decision, Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:55 am
Schultz (1988) and Madsen v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 8:02 am
Roskomnadzor v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 3:17 am
(In Carey v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:27 am
(In Carey v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Schultz. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:21 pm
Frisby v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:30 pm
— Most people don’t realize that Roe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:07 am
Frisby v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:28 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 10:06 am
Earlene Love v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
An Antique Platter of Gold (“Golden Phiale”) and the recently decided Republic of Turkey v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
An Antique Platter of Gold (“Golden Phiale”) and the recently decided Republic of Turkey v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
An Antique Platter of Gold ("Golden Phiale") and the recently decided Republic of Turkey v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:46 pm
Schultz and Dr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]